TRC is primarily funded by ad revenue. If you like the content you find here, don't block the ads check them out instead. Thank you.
Page 706 of 832 FirstFirst ... 206606656696704705706707708716756806 ... LastLast
Results 10,576 to 10,590 of 12473

Thread: The Brexit bottom line ...

  1. #10576
    Should Get Out More irie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Noviomagus Reginorum
    Posts
    21,787
    Like
    6,100
    Liked 3,066 in 2,195 posts

    Default Re: The Brexit bottom line ...


    TRC is primarily funded by ad revenue. If you like
    the content you find here, don't block the ads check
    them out instead. Thank you.
    Quote Originally Posted by saga_lout View Post
    “But of course in the end, the country voted to leave. You might not like that and I might not like that, and many people watching this programme may think that was the wrong choice. But we are a democracy.” Call Me Dave.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CSPxBKuzVE

    Couldn't have said it better myself.
    You might find this interesting - from behind the Telegraph paywall so quoted in full.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics...r-case-brexit/

    Quote Originally Posted by Fraser Nelson
    David Cameron has unwittingly written the best ever case for Brexit.

    If you voted for Brexit, your optimism might be wavering right now. I can propose just the remedy: David Cameron’s memoir. It is, unintentionally, the most convincing case for Brexit that you will ever read.

    For The Record was written as political tragedy, a 700-page apology to the nation for the former prime minister’s role in what he regards as a calamity.

    But it’s also a candid account of how he pursued an idea – that the EU can be reformed – and tested it to (his) destruction. We see him making allies, drafting strategies, threatening and begging – but his story ends in failure. He expected diplomacy, but encountered a bureaucratic Death Star whose hunger for power is matched only by its intransigence. From the former Remainer-in-Chief, it’s quite a story.

    Cameron started out a Eurosceptic, but one who thought that the irritations of the EU were a price worth paying for the general aims of solidarity and free trade. In opposition, he mocked politicians who “bang on about Europe” but in No 10 he soon found out why they did.

    Once inside its inner circle, he was exposed to the horrors. The directives, the stitch-ups, the knives always out for the City of London. He found Silvio Berlusconi advising a table of EU leaders to take a mistress in Brussels, because it was the only way to survive the late-night summits. The purpose of these meetings, he discovered, was to grind everyone into submission. Including, eventually, him.

    He found the EU to be “peacenik” on security, unable to respond to threats on its doorstep. He vetoed one of the eurozone bailout packages that threatened to suck in Britain, only to see the rules changed so the UK veto would not count. When the UK tried to go its own way, it “wasn’t simply a disagreement with the others, it was a heresy against the scripture”. He thought Angela Merkel nice, but unreliable. He refers to the “half-life of a Merkel promise”: the time taken between her making one and breaking it. In general, he found “Germany’s unfailing ability to get what it wants in the end.”

    Britain’s ability to get what it wants was, by contrast, pretty minimal. When the federalist Jean-Claude Juncker was put forward as European Commission president, Cameron was shocked to discover that just two of the 28 EU member states’ leaders wanted him.

    There is a touch of Mr Smith Goes to Washington about what happened next: why, he asks then, go along with this stitch-up? He stays up late drinking wine with fellow leaders, and they promise to back him in stopping Juncker. Then Merkel decides it’s not worth the fight, so they all support a massive decision that they all know to be wrong.

    Cameron goes home appalled. But as he was to find out, this is how things work. “‘Anyone who says that the EU is an organisation based on law and not politics has never seen it act under pressure,” he records. “Whenever there was pressure to transfer powers to Brussels, the lawyers always found a way, but when I wanted to take powers back, those same lawyers always opposed it.” It is a formula to trap democracies: use complex laws and regulation to suck powers in, but never give them back.

    So Brexit wasn’t – as is so often argued – about appeasing Tory backbenchers. In fact, Cameron rightly points out that it’s no bad thing. MPs meet constituents every week, and if the public mood changes (for example, more people thinking that EU membership has become intolerable) this gets fed back to the prime minister through the MPs. This is how a parliamentary democracy is supposed to work. His book shows him seeking to explain this, to an often baffled EU. So the renegotiation failed.

    So many of the disputes come from a basic difference in understanding. “Merkel and others just didn’t see free movement as immigration,” he admits. “If you’re from outside the EU, you’re a migrant.” So how was he going to negotiate a solution, if his counterparts could not understand the problem?

    Dealing with their officials, he says, was even worse. “To them, I was a dangerous heretic stamping on their sacred texts.” He records with amazement how the Germans (and others) saw the EU as the fount of democracy, where Brits only ever wanted a forum for economic co-operation.

    Had these been the memoirs of Nigel Farage, we might suspect that the author didn’t try too hard to win others around. But Cameron tried (and gave) everything. He once invited me to a dinner where he was talking tactics with Mark Rutte, the Dutch prime minister, about the urgent need to reform. In the book, he records how even Rutte abandoned him over Juncker’s appointment. But you can see why. Who wants to fight with the mighty EU? Cameron never quite explains why, after so many losses, he thought he might win.

    Or why he backed Remain. There is almost nothing in those 700 pages to explain why EU membership is a good thing. There is not a single example of anything emanating from Brussels that benefits Britain. So why does he start to talk about Britain’s future being in the EU and about it being a fundamental part of who we are as a country?

    He doesn’t offer a proper explanation himself. Perhaps his close friendship with George Osborne, an avid Remainer, swung him – in the way he thinks his friendship with Michael Gove and Boris Johnson ought to have swung them. It’s pretty hard to reconcile the calm, rational, patient author of the first 40 chapters of the book with that of the final seven chapters who talks about Brexiteers as careerists, villains and Islamophobes.

    But the great value of Cameron’s book is its candour. He recorded his thoughts once a month, wrote each chapter from the perspective of what he felt at the time, and has not twisted the facts to suit his final conclusion. He regards Brexit as a disaster, but those who read his book would be tempted to see it as liberation. A great democracy was being squeezed inside an unaccountable bureaucracy, and no one else in Europe wanted to risk their career by challenging it – or giving voters the chance to escape it. But Cameron did. He might, one day, come to see it as the greatest single service he did his country.

  2. The following 2 users liked this useful post by irie:


  3. #10577
    Should Get Out More saga_lout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Exiled in [s]Essex[/s] Esgender
    Posts
    28,932
    Like
    4,794
    Liked 5,459 in 3,675 posts

    Default Re: The Brexit bottom line ...

    "Boris Johnson's decision to suspend Parliament was unlawful, the Supreme Court has ruled." https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49810261

    Maybe this should have been in the "Is democracy dead" thread.

  4. #10578
    Should Get Out More Julian_Boolean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    1985
    Posts
    16,863
    Like
    1,362
    Liked 3,862 in 2,374 posts

    Default Re: The Brexit bottom line ...

    Quote Originally Posted by saga_lout View Post
    "Boris Johnson's decision to suspend Parliament was unlawful, the Supreme Court has ruled." https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49810261

    Maybe this should have been in the "Is democracy dead" thread.
    Or maybe it shows that democracy is alive - if BoJo isn't up to anything nefarious why is it a problem?

  5. The following 2 users liked this useful post by Julian_Boolean:


  6. #10579
    Really Bored
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    2,504
    Like
    998
    Liked 910 in 580 posts

    Default Re: The Brexit bottom line ...

    Parliamentary democracy >> outdated advisory referendum and rogue unelected prime minister.

  7. The following user liked this post made by MsignorMartinez:


  8. #10580
    Should Get Out More irie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Noviomagus Reginorum
    Posts
    21,787
    Like
    6,100
    Liked 3,066 in 2,195 posts

    Default Re: The Brexit bottom line ...

    Now what?

    Maybe time to call a General Election?

    With Corbyn's leadership looking increasingly insecure any other party helping Labour form a government would potentially be committing electoral suicide (imo).

    The Article 50 time bomb is still ticking.

    Everything has descended into farce.
    Last edited by irie; 24-09-19 at 10:18.

  9. #10581
    At Work
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    In the Quedge
    Posts
    1,924
    Like
    602
    Liked 647 in 375 posts

    Default Re: The Brexit bottom line ...

    It's all going swimmingly isn't it?

  10. #10582
    Should Get Out More Jasper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Dunrovin
    Posts
    11,140
    Like
    1,863
    Liked 2,594 in 1,471 posts

    Default Re: The Brexit bottom line ...

    Quote Originally Posted by irie View Post
    Now what?
    PM to resign.

  11. #10583
    Should Get Out More Horse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Always Sunny Central Southern England
    Posts
    23,369
    Like
    2,970
    Liked 3,965 in 2,635 posts

    Default Re: The Brexit bottom line ...

    Quote Originally Posted by Timmy View Post
    It's all going swimmingly isn't it?
    "Taking back power"?

  12. #10584
    Should Get Out More DefTrap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Roger Barlow's Tour of Europe
    Posts
    24,108
    Like
    3,062
    Liked 2,891 in 1,721 posts

    Default Re: The Brexit bottom line ...

    Hugely enjoying Boris's self-destruction.

  13. #10585
    Should Get Out More Ant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Sausagechester
    Posts
    19,416
    Like
    209
    Liked 1,543 in 1,098 posts

    Default Re: The Brexit bottom line ...

    Quote Originally Posted by DefTrap View Post
    Hugely enjoying Boris's self-destruction.
    Bitter far left extremists wound up in envy would be.

  14. #10586
    At Work
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    over Waterley Cross way
    Posts
    1,149
    Like
    64
    Liked 274 in 170 posts

    Default Re: The Brexit bottom line ...

    Hang on while I hop on the bandwagon.

    "It'll be fine. We're taking back control".

    Yes, another helpful post from Wossname.

  15. #10587
    Should Get Out More Ant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Sausagechester
    Posts
    19,416
    Like
    209
    Liked 1,543 in 1,098 posts

    Default Re: The Brexit bottom line ...

    So it's unlawful to prorogue parliament for a few more days so that they're unable to discuss in parliament something which they've had three years to discuss...


    ....yet it's not unlawful for John Major to prorogue parliament until after the 1997 general election - to prevent parliament discussing his cash for questions scandal.


    Mmmmmm.

  16. #10588
    Should Get Out More gremlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Eating the last biscuit with the Daily Mail reader.
    Posts
    17,357
    Like
    622
    Liked 5,295 in 2,651 posts

    Default Re: The Brexit bottom line ...

    And back to where we were under May....nowhere.

  17. The following user liked this post made by gremlin:


  18. #10589
    Should Get Out More DefTrap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Roger Barlow's Tour of Europe
    Posts
    24,108
    Like
    3,062
    Liked 2,891 in 1,721 posts

    Default Re: The Brexit bottom line ...

    Quote Originally Posted by Ant View Post
    So it's unlawful to prorogue parliament for a few more days so that they're unable to discuss in parliament something which they've had three years to discuss...


    ....yet it's not unlawful for John Major to prorogue parliament until after the 1997 general election - to prevent parliament discussing his cash for questions scandal.


    Mmmmmm.
    Get in your time machine and go find out.

  19. #10590
    Should Get Out More balbas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    SW England
    Posts
    11,922
    Like
    1,400
    Liked 3,815 in 1,975 posts

    Default Re: The Brexit bottom line ...

    I've just read the document from the court. It's pretty damming of the PM and those who advise him. I know politicians tend to be slipperier than a freshly caught eel that's been bathed in olive oil, but even so I think this *may* be the beginning of the end of BoJo as anything other than a backbencher.

    As to what happens now - dunno - remain politicians will still be wary of doing anything that will allow the country to slip out of the EU on 31 Oct, so they may well delay a vote of no confidence.

    The EU meantime are probably wondering how long they have to put up with this uncertainty.

    And after 'call me Dave' last week and BoJo this week, I can see that former Tory PMs getting honours and state funerals may well be a thing of the past. I should imagine HM is somewhat vexed.

Go Back to Forum My Forum

TRC Affiliates - Help TRC make a small amount of commission